Research

The School carries out applied research with the purpose of developing economically, legally, and socially-sound regulation and policy, using a multidisciplinary approach.

Independent aggregation in the nordic day-ahead market : what is the welfare impact of socializing supplier compensation payments?

This paper addresses the participation of independent aggregators (IAs) for demand response (DR) in European electricity markets. An IA is an aggregator trading the...

Authors
Tim Schittekatte KB ZB
Article
Environmental insurance and resilience in the age of natural disasters
Discover more
Policy Paper
Evaluating models of CO2 transport governance : from state-led to market-based approaches
Discover more

Executive Education

We offer different types of training: Online, Residential, Blended and Tailor-made courses in all levels of knowledge.

Policy Events

A wide range of events for open discussion and knowledge exchange. In Florence, Brussels, worldwide and online.

More

Discover more initiatives, broader research, and featured reports.

Lights on Women

The Lights on Women initiative promotes, trains and advocates for women in energy, climate and sustainability, boosting their visibility, representation and careers.

Discover more
FSR Annual Conference

Giving consumers too many choices: a false good idea? A lab experiment applied to water and electricity tariffs

Mayol, A., Staropoli, C.

The paper “Giving consumers too many choices: a false good idea? A lab experiment applied to water and electricity tariffs” (Mayol, A., Staropoli, C.) will be presented at the 9th Conference on the Regulation of Infrastructures (25-26 June, 2020).

ABSTRACT

Electricity and water tariffs are undergoing profound changes due to smart metering, retail competition, and regulatory changes. They have become more complex, and consumers now have a choice between different tariffs. In the context of the ecological transition, the underlying objective of these new tariffs arrangements is to use more cost-reflective pricing, so-called dynamic pricing, to incentivise consumers to adopt proper behaviors. Cost-reflective tariffs are seen as a means of increasing social equity by reducing the potential cross-subsidies embodied in flat-rate tariffs. If the goals are clear, empirical evidence from real-world pricing experiences shows that the outcomes of new tariffs do not always meet expectations. Some questions remain: How do consumers compare these new tariffs and make their choice between them? Do they take advantage of having choices among different tariffs? Do they effectively reduce or shift their consumption? This paper aims to improve the perception and adoption of tariffs by consumers in the lab. We provide evidence showing that consumers perceive simple tariffs more favourably than complex ones. However, when they receive adequate information about tariffs and behaviors, complexity is less of an issue. These results argue in favour of self-selection of tariff forms to take into account the different capacities of consumers to respond to the price signal. The results also suggest that the decentralisation of the policy of conserving natural resources through tariffs remains very limited. The use of centralised mechanisms, such as norms or rules, is still preferable to avoid the misperception of tariffs.

Presentation

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

mayolAlexandre Mayol is an Assistant Professor in economics at the University of Lorraine, a researcher at BETA (UMR 7522) and at the research fellow in Public-Private Partnership Economics Chair of the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. He specializes in industrial organization and applied microeconomics. His research work concerns the regulation of network industries, and more particularly in the water and electricity sectors in France, which have given rise to publications and expert assignments. He has notably published on the evaluation of the different pricing methods for drinking water in France. He obtained his PhdD in economics at the Paris School of Economics – University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, after his schooling at the Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan. He is also a graduate in economics and management (agregation), and holds a Masters in Public Business Law (University of Paris 1).

Don’t miss any update on this topic

Sign up for free and access the latest publications and insights

Sign up
Back to top