In this Debate, we aim at identifying some fundamentals for realising a coherent regulatory framework for energy storage facilities across the energy vectors with a focus on achieving the optimumal flexibility from storage facilities.
Storage for all forms of energy vectors is of key importance for achieving the EU’s climate and energy targets. Storage has a crucial role in achieving security of supply, reliability and flexibility. These goals cannot always be pursued simultaneously however and some forms of storage may be more suited to serving some goals than others.
In the FSR Debate, we ask whether we are considering all the options as to how to accommodate storage in the new regulatory frameworks under consideration, and in particular to maximise the demand and supply flexibility that different forms of storage can offer.
If the objective is to strive for flexibility maximisation, how should we position energy storage within the regulatory framework? Is storage to be positioned as part of the transmission or distribution network? Is it a back up for flexible supply or is it an independent service? Who should offer different types of storage-related services and who should not? Should we revisit the unbundling rules? How should injection into storage and withdrawal from storage be charged in order not to distort the efficient use of resources in the overall energy system?
In all these aspects we will consider whether and how to align gas and electricity regulatory principles and practice. Do we follow the existing rules on electricity or on gas or do we develop a new, harmonised approach across the sectors.
As to network tariff methodologies for gas storage – are these likely to be a barrier to innovative flexibility services or should we seek to maintain guarantees for fair access? Do we have to mirror this approach for other forms of storage such as batteries?
This in turn raises the issue of whether the current approach to fuel specific network codes, guidelines – one distinct set for gas – one set for electricity needs to revamped?
Introduction to the Debate and Opening Presentations
14.00 – 14.05 Introduction to the Debate
Leigh Hancher| Florence School of Regulation
14.05 – 14.15 An energy system needs storage. Storage is everywhere
Ronnie Belmans | CEO Energyville
14.15 – 14.25 The role of gas storage – time for a regulatory upgrade?
Carole le Hénaff | GIE/Storengy
Panel Discussion: Introductory Remarks, Polls, and Comments
Moderator: Alberto Pototschnig | Florence School of Regulation
14.25 – 14.45 Introductory remarks from the panellists
Guido Cervigni | DFC Economic
Doug Wood | EFET
Benoit Esnault | ACER/CRE
14.45 – 14.50 Polls
14.50 – 15.20 Comments on the outcome of the polls and Q&A from the audience
15.20 – 15.30 Concluding remarks
Alberto Pototschnig | Florence School of Regulation
Leigh Hancher | Florence School of Regulation and Tilburg University
The focus of the debate series is on recent court cases, regulatory decisions, EU legislation, or public consultations to be discussed by a panel of experts.
Hosts: Prof. Leigh Hancher and Prof. Alberto Pototschnig
To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.