Setting a right baseline for methane mitigation policies – science and policy perspectives

Highlights from the FSR Debate: How to establish a right baseline for rigid methane mitigation policies

On 1 December, the Florence School of Regulation held a joint webinar with the Environmental Defense Fund, “How to establish a right baseline for rigid methane mitigation policies”. The webinar combined science and policy perspectives and provide insights into ongoing methane measurement initiatives and critical areas for further research.

The state of methane science

Our knowledge on climate change stems from the regularly updated Assessment Reports prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Sixth Assessment Report (AR6 WG 1) published earlier this year shed more light on the impact of Short-lived Climate Pollutants, including methane.

Since the publication of AR5 in 2013, our understanding and quantification of how methane contributes to human-caused warming improved, but it also led to alarming conclusions. AR6 confirms that methane concentrations in the atmosphere continue to increase at an unprecedented pace, primarily due to rising emissions from fossil fuels and agriculture. Hence, reducing methane emissions would limit the warming effect and improve air quality by lowering global surface ozone.

However, the IPCC findings need to be supported by a better understanding of emission sources. Two measurement campaigns conducted in Romania and Australia help to fill in this gap. Both projects introduced during the webinar used a combination of top-down and bottom-up measurements to understand better methane emissions from the oil and gas sector (Romero project) and coal seam gas in the Surat Basin, Australia.

Policy perspectives

In the second session, the speakers highlighted what other changes are necessary to ensure that more robust data and understanding of emission sources lead to evidence-based mitigation policies and, as a result, effective methane emission reductions.

Firstly, the newly created International Methane Emission Observatory could help to bring different data sources and methodological approaches together. Secondly, the development of emissions quantification methodologies with clearly specified uncertainty ranges, such as the ones proposed by the OGMP2.0.

Those developments are essential to help the companies and jurisdictions worldwide set a robust baseline and track progress against climate goals, such as the Global Methane Pledge.

Read more

EU Methane legislation is expected in December

The COP26 methane moment


More on Gas

Gas
Counteracting the energy crisis: new emergency measures adopted by the EU
Counteracting the energy crisis: new emergency measures adopted by the EU

The second installment of the Topic of the Month on Energy Security analyses the three emergency measures that the EU…

Gas
EU gas markets: spring has arrived, but how do we prepare for next winter?
EU gas markets: spring has arrived, but how do we prepare for next winter?

The FSR Debate which took place on the 8th of March focused on the current outlook for European gas markets.…

Lessons learned from the crisis: insights on three newly introduced EU emergency gas measures
Lessons learned from the crisis: insights on three newly introduced EU emergency gas measures

When the current energy emergency hit Europe, natural gas and electricity prices spiked. The reduction of Russian gas imports to…

Join our community

To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.

scroll

top