logo-eui RSCAS



Valerie Reif

Topic of the Month


A new deal for energy consumers: consumer data management

A new deal for energy consumers From the Clean Energy Package to the future of Electricity Network Codes FSR Topic of the Month by Athir Nouicer, Valerie […] read more


stop brexit march

Elecxit: How is Brexit likely to affect the profitability of an electricity interconnection?

Elecxit by S. Ambec and C. Cramps (Toulouse School of Economics) In its decision of 11 July 2019, the French Energy Regulation Commission (CRE) expressed […] read more


Tim Schittekatte

Flexibility mechanisms: from the Clean Energy Package to the Network Codes

A new deal for energy consumers From the Clean Energy Package to the future of Electricity Network Codes   FSR Topic of the Month by […] read more


Shaping the EU framework towards 2030 and beyond

Event Highlights


Shaping the EU framework towards 2030 and beyond

On Monday 1st July, the Florence School of Regulation hosted the Executive Workshop: ‘Shaping the EU framework towards 2030 and beyond’, co-organized in cooperation with […] read more


Nicolo Rossetto

Caught in between: the case of regulated grids

FSR Topic of the Month by Nicolò Rossetto and Piero Carlo Dos Reis New business models in a changing industry Electricity grids – both transmission and distribution – […] read more


Piero Carlo Dos Reis Trainee FSR

Topic of the Month


Digitalisation of retail-size units: innovative services for targeted customers

FSR Topic of the Month by Piero Carlo Dos Reis New business models in a changing industry The digitalisation of retail-size units is driving the emergence […] read more


Piero Carlo Dos Reis Trainee FSR

Topic of the Month


Greening electricity: between new assets and special revenue streams

FSR Topic of the Month by Piero Carlo Dos Reis and Nicolò Rossetto New business models in a changing industry Green generation consists of technologies able to […] read more


Nicolo Rossetto

Four building blocks and two business models

FSR Topic of the Month by Nicolò Rossetto New business models in a changing industry Decarbonisation and digitalisation are changing the way value is created, delivered […] read more


Can trees and poles live side by side?

by S. Ambec and C. Crampes Toulouse School of Economics Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed for bankruptcy on January 29, 2019. The Californian […] read more

Page 1 of 1612345Next ›Last »
Valerie Reif

A new deal for energy consumers: consumer data management

- Electricity

A new deal for energy consumers

From the Clean Energy Package to the future of Electricity Network Codes

FSR Topic of the Month by Athir NouicerValerie ReifTim Schittekatte 

In this Topic of the Month, we look at new developments in the area of electricity network codes and guidelines that were triggered by the recent adoption of the Clean Energy Package (CEP). The recast of the electricity Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/943) explicitly lists several areas for new network codes and guidelines. In many other areas, the electricity Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/944) allows Member States to first experiment with innovative regulation. Best practices may later inspire the development of new European principles or rules or point out necessary amendments to network codes and guidelines.

The research FSR Energy conducts on these areas is done in the context of the European H2020 project INTERRFACE (“TSO-DSO-Consumer INTERFACE aRchitecture to provide innovative grid services for an efficient power system”). INTERRFACE brings together more than 40 partners from all across the electricity sector. Besides thinking about future regulation, several pilots are also being set up as a part of the project.

Week 2. Consumer data management

by Valerie Reif

What is it about?

Consumers have been given the right to access and share their own energy data by recent EU legislation from the Third Energy Package and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to the Clean Energy Package (CEP). As part of the CEP, the recast of the e-Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/944) lays down general principles for how Member States should deal with consumer data. Among others, they require Member States to create an adequate regulatory framework to organise the management of consumer data.

Existing Data Management Models (DMMs) vary a great deal across Member States [1]. They typically consist of a set of different roles, responsibilities, legal frameworks, technical standards as well as informal rules. DMMs can be categorised according to numerous different dimensions, yet a fundamental distinction can be made between centralised and decentralised models, as shown in Figure 1 and described below according to a report by CEER. The centralised models are structured as Data Exchange Platforms (DEPs), which can either be a fully centralised model (data hub) or a partially centralised model (communication hub).

types of data management models

Figure 1: Overview of types of data management models

  • In a decentralised model, the key aspects of data management are decentralised and within the DSO’s responsibility. The means of exchanging data among market parties and the DSO is often a rather simple format, sometimes standardised yet often non-standardised. Customers have to specifically contact the DSO for access to data.
  • In a partially centralised model one or few key aspects of data management are centralised, typically distribution and access to data. This model thus enables centralised access (via the communication hub) to data stored in several decentralised databases (at DSOs or at metering points).
  • A fully centralised model comprises the centralisation of all key aspects related to data exchange. It typically represents a one-stop shop for data, where DSOs, market actors and all consumers have only one actor, the data hub, which they relate to.

In many Member States, the choice between centralised and decentralised models can be assumed to be a mere result of the existing legacy systems. While traditionally, consumer data was exchanged bilaterally, now more and more MS are transitioning from a decentralised to a more centralised approach. However, large disparities remain across Member States. When assessing these large disparities in DMMs across Member States in its Impact Assessment for the Market Design Initiative in 2016, the European Commission identified three options for future DMMs: (i) sole responsibility by the Member State, (ii) common criteria and principles and (iii) a common EU model. Both the European Commission and network companies (both TSOs and DSOs) share the view that option number two, common criteria and principles, is the most suitable way forward.

What does the Clean Energy Package say?

Despite the widespread agreement that the best solution for managing consumer data must be assessed for each national context, it is acknowledged that a lack of standardisation and interoperability can pose barriers to retail competition [2]. More precisely, it can create entry barriers to mainly national retail markets for established suppliers who want to expand their business to other Member States [3]. The need for interoperable solutions is also reflected in the provisions of the Clean Energy Package.

Article 23 of the e-Directive states that Member States shall organise the management of data to ensure efficient and secure data access and exchange, as well as data protection and data security. It is important to note that the Clean Energy Package expresses no preference of one DMM over the other. Instead, the principles laid down apply independently of the DMM. To ensure compliance with the requirements of the e-Directive, the Member State or a designated competent authority shall authorise and certify, or where applicable, supervise, the parties responsible for the data management.

Further, Article 24 of the e-Directive addresses the need for Member States to facilitate the full interoperability of energy services within the Union to promote competition in the retail market and to avoid excessive administrative costs.

Which Network Code and Guideline Areas are relevant?

In the domain of consumer data management, none of the designated areas for new network codes listed in Article 59 of the e-Regulation can be directly applied.

However, regarding interoperability, Article 24 of the e-Directive also states that the Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, interoperability requirements as well as non-discriminatory and transparent procedures for access to data. According to the CEP, network codes can henceforth be adopted either as delegated or implementing acts. This may thus open up the possibility for interoperability requirements and procedures for data across all Member States to be defined by means of a new network code. The European Commission currently considers such an implementing act among the three most important acts to be addressed based on the provisions in the Clean Energy Package, as expressed in the context of the Florence Forum 2019.



 [1] As explained in the report on TSO-DSO Data Management by ENTSO-E, Eurelectric, EDSO, GEODE and CEDEC, a data management model refers to ‘the framework of roles and responsibilities assigned to any party within the electricity system and market and the subsequent duties related to data collection, processing, delivery, exchanges, publishing and access.’

[2] The e-Directive defines interoperability, in the context of smart metering, as ‘the ability of two or more energy or communication networks, systems, devices, applications or components to interwork to exchange and use information in order to perform required functions.’

[3] One example in this context are the Nordic countries that have been working towards harmonising their electricity retail markets since 2005. NordREG states that the aim is not to implement one single retail market, but among others to reduce market entry barriers for retailers who want to extend their business to other Nordic countries. To facilitate harmonisation, all Nordic countries are moving towards the implementation of data hubs for metering data and market processes. The harmonisation of business processes is largely completed. However, on the more technical level a supplier currently needs to comply with one interface for each hub, which constitutes a market barrier due to the need and costs to operate four IT subsystems in parallel.

Join FSR Energy & Climate Community

Subscribe to our Newsletter



* indicates required
What topics are you interested in?

Florence School of Regulation will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates about our upcoming online and residential events, publications and other activities.All you need to do to receive insightful updates from us is to click the button below:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at daniela.bernardo@eui.eu. Personal data will be processed in accordance with the EUI’s Data Protection Policy (President’s Decision No. 40 of 27 August 2013 regarding Data Protection at the EUI) as well as under the specific modalities outlined in the Privacy statement for events organised at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.