Research

The School carries out applied research with the purpose of developing economically, legally, and socially-sound regulation and policy, using a multidisciplinary approach.

Independent aggregation in the nordic day-ahead market : what is the welfare impact of socializing supplier compensation payments?

This paper addresses the participation of independent aggregators (IAs) for demand response (DR) in European electricity markets. An IA is an aggregator trading the...

Authors
Tim Schittekatte KB ZB
Article
Environmental insurance and resilience in the age of natural disasters
Discover more
Policy Paper
Evaluating models of CO2 transport governance : from state-led to market-based approaches
Discover more

Executive Education

We offer different types of training: Online, Residential, Blended and Tailor-made courses in all levels of knowledge.

Policy Events

A wide range of events for open discussion and knowledge exchange. In Florence, Brussels, worldwide and online.

More

Discover more initiatives, broader research, and featured reports.

Lights on Women

The Lights on Women initiative promotes, trains and advocates for women in energy, climate and sustainability, boosting their visibility, representation and careers.

Discover more

Bolognesi, T. “In the Shadow of Sunshine Regulation: considering disclosure biases”

The paper “In the Shadow of Sunshine Regulation: Considering Disclosure Biases” (Bolognesi, T.) will be presented at the 6th Conference on the Regulation of Infrastructures (16 June 2017). 

ABSTRACT

Information asymmetries and principal-agent relations are crucial issues in network industries regulation. Therefore, besides incentive-based regulations, regulators developed tools dedicated to reveal hidden information and make regulation “smart”. In their very essence, these tools consist in benchmarking services and differ according to the use of benchmarking outputs. In this contribution, we consider performance measurement and sunshine regulation because of a discrepancy between literature and practices. Most of the empirical assessments conclude impacts of sunshine regulation on service performance are not signi cant while in policies the use of benchmarking increase. Instead of focussing on impacts, we look at the process of disclosure in sunshine regulation arguing that this process is subject to biases avoiding robust analysis of impacts. We assume there are three types of behaviour that cause these biases: opportunism, transaction costs minimisation and pro-social motivations. Our dataset combines 795 observations, and the results con firm impacts of opportunism and pro-social motivations while we find no persuasive evidence of the impacts of the complexity of indicators calculation.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas Bolognesi is a researcher at the University of Geneva and member of the Unesco Chair in Hydropolitics. His research interests include political economics, organisational economics and institutional economics. He focuses on the regulation of urban water systems as well as on the governance of environmental resources. He is co-editor of the book series Palgrave Studies in Water Governance.

Personal webpage: https://www.unige.ch/gedt/membres/thomas-bolognesi

Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Bolognesi

DOWNLOAD 

Presentation by Thomas Bolognesi

 

Don’t miss any update on this topic

Sign up for free and access the latest publications and insights

Sign up
Back to top