Economic regulators of water and sanitation services (WSS) across Europe were originally established to address harmful consequences arising from the natural monopoly of the sector. This is reflected in their mandates, practices, and regulatory philosophies. While they apply different tariff methodologies, they share commonalities with respect to the overall objective of preventing monopolistic price abuse by WSS operators and protecting consumers’ interests, while at the same time ensuring that operators are sustainably funded and incentivised to maintain and improve service quality standards. At the European level, these regulators operate in a context where the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) introduced in 2000, requires Member States’ regulation of WSS to reflect not only the economic cost of providing WSS services, but environmental and resource costs as well. However, the shift to a ‘full cost’ model has proved difficult, with no Member State achieving full compliance with this goal even two decades later. This situation underlines the key role that WSS regulators have in promoting and improving the adoption full cost reflective tariffs. Furthermore, in a broader context where climate change exacerbates water risks and increases the need for resilient WSS services, water regulators can also play a crucial role in incentivising and ing WSS operators in making their ecological transition. This paper identifies the current practices employed by regulators in supporting the ecological transition of WSS operators, including reflecting the full cost of WSS services, promoting the adoption of circular economy (CE) practices, and addressing emerging challenges such as micropollutants. It also provides options for new and better ways to support the ecological transition of WSS operators. Finally, it concludes with recommendations to support water regulators in shifting from a narrow ‘regulation of natural monopolies’ focus towards a broader role as regulators of externalities.
As stated by the OECD, “water security in many regions will continue to deteriorate due to increasing water demand, water stress and water pollution.” Indeed water supply and sanitation (WSS) [...]
Multimodal digital mobility services (MDMS) are instrumental to fostering multimodality as they promote comparability, transparency, and the selling of products across operators and modes. MDMS stand to directly benefit passengers [...]
We need to wonder if a reform of the EU internal electricity market would suffice to deliver EU energy security, decarbonization, and electrification. Regrettably, this is not the case. Let [...]
La crise énergétique a révélé l’incapacité de l’or- ganisation du marché européen de l’électricité à répondre aux trois défis de la décarbonation, de la sécurité d’approvisionnement et des prix abordables. [...]
Réussir l’électrification des usages pour mener la transition écologique et renforcer la souveraineté énergétique et industrielle de la France. Selon les principaux scénarios, la trajectoire de décarbonation entraînera une augmentation [...]
La notion de « réforme des marchés européens de l’électricité » est tout à fait d’actualité au moment où nous rédigeons ce document de travail, au début de l’année 2023. [...]
Join our community
To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.