Energy | Gas | Technical Report
Towards an efficient and sustainable tariff methodology for the European gas transmission network
18 January 2019
BY: CERVIGNI Guido, Ilaria Conti, Jean-Michel Glachant, TESIO Enrico, VOLPATO Francesco
Gas transmission in Europe is currently based on the so-called entry-exit model. Under such a model, Europe is divided into gas balancing zones – also called entry-exit systems – and capacity is charged at both entry and exit points of every balancing zone. Current entry-exit systems largely coincide with Member States’ territory. The cost of gas transmission networks in Europe is thus covered via the so-called entry-exit tariffs. The shift to the entry-exit model was one of the most effective measures included in the Third Energy Package (2007), which facilitated smooth transition from the traditional system, based on vertically integrated European gas industry structures to a single liberalised European market. However, as the EU gas market develops, the current tariff methodology is now being questioned, on the grounds that it may be unsuitable to achieve the objective of a single pan-European market, with unbiased gas flows and no obstacles to trading. This paper analyses alternative tariff methodologies that would address the drawbacks of the current system. The first approach meets the transmission revenue requirement by charging only the transmission network’s exit points to distribution networks and to directly connected end-customers. The second approach does not charge entry and exit intra-EU boundaries, and offsets the missed revenues via charges at the points of entry of foreign gas supply into the EU transmission system. Further, we investigate data on physical gas flows, commercial transactions between EU countries and non-EU suppliers and capacity bookings, from multiple sources. Our analysis suggests that: i) current gas flow patterns in Europe are different from those that minimize intra-EU shipping cost evaluated at the current transmission tariffs; we conjecture that this feature is related to the existing stock of long-term capacity holdings; ii) in case the optimal flow pattern was implemented, a material reduction of overall tariff revenues would occur, other things being equal; further, the revenue shortfall would be unevenly split among routes and system operators; iii) the cost of shipping gas to a European country from different points of entry into the European network is materially different, to the point that one cannot rule out the possibility that the current tariff model has an impact on the selection of the upstream suppliers.
logo cadmus Read it on Cadmus Download in open access

LATEST FSR PUBLICATIONS

Working Paper
In this paper, we discuss the implementation of Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms (CRM) in the European Union (EU). We first illustrate that the costs of CRMs in the EU are significantly [...]
Other
Additionality is a key requirement for the renewables based electricity to be used by electrolysers to produce renewable hydrogen. Additionality could be defined as the requirement that renewables-based electricity used [...]
Working Paper
China has always upheld multilateralism and has advocated the use of multilateral mechanisms to jointly address global climate change issues. This paper discusses what China does and why, and how [...]
Working Paper
Interoperability in the context of smart electricity metering is high on the European policy agenda but its essence has been challenging to capture. In this paper, we look at experiences [...]
Other
Around 75% of European cargo transport operations in terms of ton-kilometers are performed by trucks, which, in turn, entail massive environmental and societal impacts. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, road [...]
Other
Green LNG is a newly emerging trend in the natural gas industry which has been incentivised by the decarbonisation process. This new line of thinking encourages LNG suppliers to offset [...]

Join our community

To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.

scroll

top