Research

The School carries out applied research with the purpose of developing economically, legally, and socially-sound regulation and policy, using a multidisciplinary approach.

Cross-border solidarity versus national capacity markets : risk of inadequate capacity procurement

In Europe, capacity markets are currently designed and operated at the national level, which can give rise to non-cooperative behavior. Member States may strategically...

Authors
Contribution to book
Reflections on climate resilient tourism : evidence for the EU ETS-2 and voluntary carbon markets
Discover more
Article
Research on the impact of urban rail transit on the financing constraints of enterprises from the perspective of sustainability
Discover more

Executive Education

We offer different types of training: Online, Residential, Blended and Tailor-made courses in all levels of knowledge.

Policy Events

A wide range of events for open discussion and knowledge exchange. In Florence, Brussels, worldwide and online.

More

Discover more initiatives, broader research, and featured reports.

Lights on Women

The Lights on Women initiative promotes, trains and advocates for women in energy, climate and sustainability, boosting their visibility, representation and careers.

Discover more
Other

The role of the EU and ACER to ensure an adequate regulatory framework for projects of common interest

• Projects of common interest are important high-value projects for achieving EU energy and climate policy objectives. To the extent that these projects have higher risks, we need to make sure that the regulatory frameworks also incentivize investment at the high end of the risk spectrum. • In this brief we discuss whether an adequate framework for projects of common interest implies moving towards a dedicated regulatory framework, concluding that this is not necessarily necessary. • Some Member States might prefer to apply their default regulatory framework to projects of common interest. This approach avoids the additional costs of administering another framework. However, the conventional default framework provides the same return for all infrastructure investment, implying a risk of underpaying for high-risk investment and overpaying for low-risk investment. • Other Member States might prefer to apply a dedicated regulatory framework for important infrastructure investment to projects of common interest. These dedicated frameworks allow dealing with underpaying for important investment as well as mitigating the risk of overpaying by adjusting incentives to the value and risk of a project. • In both cases, the EU and ACER have important roles to play in ensuring that the regulatory framework applying to projects of common interest is adequate. Their roles could include assessing the applicable frameworks, assisting NRAs with multi-jurisdictional coordination, ensuring dedicated frameworks for investment of national importance apply also to projects of common interest, and assisting NRAs on a voluntary basis with performing case-by-case assessments.

MEEUS, Leonardo; KEYAERTS, Nico, The role of the EU and ACER to ensure an adequate regulatory framework for projects of common interest - hdl.handle.net

Don’t miss any update on this topic

Sign up for free and access the latest publications and insights

Sign up
Back to top