Working Paper
Why not call a margin squeeze a margin squeeze?
06 September 2019

Authors: CROCIONI, Pietro

At the end of October 2018, Ofcom issued its first abuse of dominance infringement decision and fine under the Competition Act 1998 against Royal Mail. Perhaps surprisingly, Ofcom did not examine the behaviour as either a margin squeeze or a refusal to supply, the types of cases one would expect in post (and communications) services. Instead, it looked at it under the old-fashioned banner of price discrimination. We consider that the way Ofcom approached the analysis is unlikely to provide helpful guidance to the industry and critically does not provide a useful basis for concluding whether Royal Mail’s behaviour has led to exclusion and consumer harm.
logo cadmus Read it on Cadmus Download in open access

LATEST FSR PUBLICATIONS

Technical Report
The European rail sector is experiencing a rapid transformation thanks to digitalisation. At the same time, policymakers and industry stakeholders navigate the challenges of regulation, digitalisation, and fair competition. From [...]
Book
This timely book sheds light on the challenges facing European rail, air and intermodal transport regulation. Considering the impact of developments from digitalization to climate change, expert contributors provide a [...]
Contribution to book
Data sharing in transport has been identified as a key enabler of the development of new digital platforms that aggregate services for the benefit of passengers, both services provided by [...]

Join our community

To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.

scroll

top