Working Paper
Why not call a margin squeeze a margin squeeze?
06 September 2019

Authors: CROCIONI, Pietro

At the end of October 2018, Ofcom issued its first abuse of dominance infringement decision and fine under the Competition Act 1998 against Royal Mail. Perhaps surprisingly, Ofcom did not examine the behaviour as either a margin squeeze or a refusal to supply, the types of cases one would expect in post (and communications) services. Instead, it looked at it under the old-fashioned banner of price discrimination. We consider that the way Ofcom approached the analysis is unlikely to provide helpful guidance to the industry and critically does not provide a useful basis for concluding whether Royal Mail’s behaviour has led to exclusion and consumer harm.
logo cadmus Read it on Cadmus Download in open access

LATEST FSR PUBLICATIONS

Article
This paper addresses the participation of independent aggregators (IAs) for demand response (DR) in European electricity markets. An IA is an aggregator trading the flexibility of consumers of which it [...]
Article
The emergence of natural disasters induces a trade-off in the environmental insurance market. While firms need more coverage against large potential losses, the higher damage caused by accidents increases the [...]
Policy Paper
Large-scale CO2 transport infrastructure is crucial for achieving decarbonization goals, yet its deployment remains slow. This paper maps emerging CO2 transport governance models across two dimensions: State-led policies and Economic [...]

Join our community

To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.

scroll

top