Research

The School carries out applied research with the purpose of developing economically, legally, and socially-sound regulation and policy, using a multidisciplinary approach.

EU transport competitiveness

The European Union is entering a decade that will be decisive for its global competitiveness. This is particularly the case in the transport sector....

Authors
Elodie  Petrozziello JJMP
Article
Should I offset or should I plough? : voluntary carbon offsets and ETS in an evolutionary model
Discover more
Article
The regulatory framework for independent aggregators
Discover more

Executive Education

We offer different types of training: Online, Residential, Blended and Tailor-made courses in all levels of knowledge.

Policy Events

A wide range of events for open discussion and knowledge exchange. In Florence, Brussels, worldwide and online.

More

Discover more initiatives, broader research, and featured reports.

Energy Regulation Academy

The Energy Regulation Academy (EnRA) is a 3-year capacity-building initiative to help accelerate the energy transition in Europe.

Discover more
Technical Report

What to expect from sectoral trading : a U.S.-China example

In recent United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations, sectoral mechanisms were proposed as a way to encourage early action and spur investment in low carbon technologies in developing countries, particularly in the electricity sector. Sectoral trading, which is one such proposition, involves including a sector from one or more nations in an international cap-and-trade system. In order to assess potential impacts from such a mechanism, we analyze trade in carbon permits between the Chinese electricity sector and a U.S. economy-wide cap-and-trade program using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model. We find that this sectoral policy induces significant financial transfers between the two countries. In 2030, the U.S. purchases permits valued at $42 billion from China, which represents more than 46% of its capped emissions. Despite these transfers, there is only a small change in Chinese welfare. In the U.S., the availability of relatively cheap emissions permits significantly reduces the cost of climate policy. In China, sectoral trading increases the price of electricity and reduces the amount of electricity generated, particularly from coal, while opposite effects are observed in the U.S. Despite increases in the price of electricity in China, only small increases in electricity generation from nuclear and renewables are projected in the timeframe of our analysis (2010- 2030). Because the price of coal decree ses, we also find that sectoral trading leads to emissions increases in non-electricity sectors in China, a form of internal carbon leakage.

GAVARD, Claire; WINCHESTER, Niven; JACOBY, Henry D.; PALTSEV, Sergey, What to expect from sectoral trading : a U.S.-China example - hdl.handle.net

Don’t miss any update on this topic

Sign up for free and access the latest publications and insights

Sign up

Latest publication in the same area

Jacopo Cammeo Albert Ferrari Simone Borghesi JD MH HM
Simone Borghesi Pedro  Linares KN MS FB CB
Matteo Mazzarano Simone Borghesi GG
Fabio Gaetano Santeramo MG
Fabio Gaetano Santeramo PD MGRF MAM AAH MB
Simone Borghesi IC GI AT
Back to top