Research

The School carries out applied research with the purpose of developing economically, legally, and socially-sound regulation and policy, using a multidisciplinary approach.

Proposal for reviewing the Regulation on trans-European Networks for Energy (TEN-E) : assessment and recommendations

Energy networks play an essential role in enabling competition, thus improving energy affordability, and in supporting decarbonisation of energy demand and security of supply....

Authors
Ronnie  Belmans Alberto Pototschnig ECSM
Article
Loss and damage of climate change : recognition, obligation and legal consequences
Discover more
Technical Report
A study on the relevance of consumer rights and protections in the context of innovative energy-related services
Discover more

Executive Education

We offer different types of training: Online, Residential, Blended and Tailor-made courses in all levels of knowledge.

Policy Events

A wide range of events for open discussion and knowledge exchange. In Florence, Brussels, worldwide and online.

More

Discover more initiatives, broader research, and featured reports.

Lights on Women

The Lights on Women initiative promotes, trains and advocates for women in energy, climate and sustainability, boosting their visibility, representation and careers.

Discover more
Technical Report

What to expect from sectoral trading : a U.S.-China example

In recent United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations, sectoral mechanisms were proposed as a way to encourage early action and spur investment in low carbon technologies in developing countries, particularly in the electricity sector. Sectoral trading, which is one such proposition, involves including a sector from one or more nations in an international cap-and-trade system. In order to assess potential impacts from such a mechanism, we analyze trade in carbon permits between the Chinese electricity sector and a U.S. economy-wide cap-and-trade program using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model. We find that this sectoral policy induces significant financial transfers between the two countries. In 2030, the U.S. purchases permits valued at $42 billion from China, which represents more than 46% of its capped emissions. Despite these transfers, there is only a small change in Chinese welfare. In the U.S., the availability of relatively cheap emissions permits significantly reduces the cost of climate policy. In China, sectoral trading increases the price of electricity and reduces the amount of electricity generated, particularly from coal, while opposite effects are observed in the U.S. Despite increases in the price of electricity in China, only small increases in electricity generation from nuclear and renewables are projected in the timeframe of our analysis (2010- 2030). Because the price of coal decree ses, we also find that sectoral trading leads to emissions increases in non-electricity sectors in China, a form of internal carbon leakage.

GAVARD, Claire; WINCHESTER, Niven; JACOBY, Henry D.; PALTSEV, Sergey, What to expect from sectoral trading : a U.S.-China example - hdl.handle.net

Don’t miss any update on this topic

Sign up for free and access the latest publications and insights

Sign up

Latest publication in the same area

Matteo Mazzarano Simone Borghesi GG
Fabio Gaetano Santeramo MG
Fabio Gaetano Santeramo PD MGRF MAM AAH MB
Simone Borghesi IC GI AT
JA MK LS
Albert Ferrari Marie Raude KL NDH JE IHC
Back to top