‘The impact of the EU methane strategy on the natural gas market’ is the second joint webinar organised by the Florence School of Regulation and the Environmental Defense Fund.
The question leading the second online event is how to incentivise the methane emissions reductions from the whole natural gas value chain.
Watch the recording:
The international action on methane emissions features prominently in the EU strategy to reduce methane emissions published on October 14, 2020. Despite the fact that the EU accounts for a small share of global methane emissions, it has a significant leverage as the largest importer of oil and gas to advocate for robust monitoring and mitigation of methane emissions.
In the Strategy EU Commission has prioritised monitoring, reporting and verification of methane emissions, keeping the door open for a possibility to adopt targets or standards, in the absence of significant commitments for the other jurisdictions. A part of the industry already calls for methane-intensity based production and procurement standards[1].
The strategy sets as a priority “ensuring that companies apply considerably more accurate measurement and reporting methodologies for methane emissions”, both within and outside the EU. To this objective, the EU Commission is promoting the creation of an international methane emissions observatory with a task to compile and publish a methane-supply index (MSI) demonstrating the emissions arising before natural gas or oil reach the final customer.
Independently from the developments in Europe, this year the Singapore’s biggest buyer of LNG, Pavilion Energy, has asked all LNG sellers to quantify the GHG emissions associated with each LNG cargo produced, transported and imported into Singapore. The environmental considerations led Engie to step back from signing a contract with the US LNG supplier. Energir, the main importer of Quebec also developed its own, corporate performance standard and procurement standard in collaboration with Equitable Origin.
These developments raise many questions, which will be tackled during the joint FSR-EDF webinar:
What level of governance can be most effective in determining the equivalency of regulations adopted in different jurisdictions?
Introduction
Poppy Kalesi | EDF
Christopher Jones | FSR
Keynote presentation on methane emissions from natural gas value chain imports in Europe and lessons learned from the Arctic Council’s ACAP Working Group
Stephanie Saunier | Carbon Limits
Keynote presentation on establishing an International Methane Emissions Observatory
Manfredi Caltagirone | UNEP
Panel discussion
Stefano Grassi | European Commission
Jutta Paulus | European Parliament
Nicolás González Casares | European Parliament
Stefan Rolle | Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany
Jonathan Stern | Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
Samuel Kotis | Environmental Defense Fund
Toshiyuki Sakamoto |The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan
Georges Tijbosch | MiQ
Conclusions
Poppy Kalesi | EDF
Christopher Jones | FSR
Jonathan Stern, 2020 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
To meet, discuss and learn in the channel that suits you best.