logo-eui RSCAS
FSR

Topic of the Month


Energy Union Law

Tanase

Topic of the Month

26.07.2018

Implementation Challenges: Private agreements

FSR Topic of the Month: Network Codes & Guidelines. A legal perspective. by Lavinia-Petronela Tanase (FSR)   Week 3: Implementation challenges. Private agreements Last week, the blog […] read more

Energy Union Law

Tanase

Topic of the Month

19.07.2018

Implementation Challenges: Terms, Conditions and Methodologies

FSR Topic of the Month: Network Codes & Guidelines. A legal perspective. by Lavinia-Petronela Tanase (FSR)   Week 2: Implementation Challenges: Terms, Conditions and Methodologies. The EU […] read more

Energy Union Law

Tanase

Topic of the Month

10.07.2018

Network Codes versus Guidelines

FSR Topic of the Month: Network Codes & Guidelines. A legal perspective. by Lavinia-Petronela Tanase (FSR)   Week 1: Network Codes versus Guidelines Pursuant to the […] read more

Electricity

Topic of the Month

3.07.2018

Energy sector regulation on the Indian Ocean islands

Week 4 – FSR Topic of the Month: Energising Islands in the age of transition This month, the FSR is featuring the energy transition in […] read more

Electricity

Topic of the Month

28.06.2018

How are islands promoting and integrating renewables?

Week 3 – FSR Topic of the Month: Energising Islands in the age of transition This month, the FSR is featuring the energy transition in […] read more

Electricity

Topic of the Month

20.06.2018

Will Islands get the electrification formula right?

Week 2 – FSR Topic of the Month: Energising Islands in the age of transition This month, FSR is featuring the energy transition in the […] read more

Electricity

Topic of the Month

8.06.2018

Islands’ dilemma on the road to energy transition

FSR Topic of the Month: Energising islands in the age of transition This month, FSR is featuring the Indian Ocean islands of Mauritius, Seychelles, Madagascar […] read more

Electricity

Pradyumna Bhagwat

Topic of the Month

28.05.2018

Quantifying the impact of stakeholder engagement

FSR Topic of the Month:  Raising public awareness and trust in electricity transmission infrastructure development Written by Pradyumna Bhagwat Quantifying the impact of stakeholder engagement Despite […] read more

Electricity

Pradyumna Bhagwat

Topic of the Month

21.05.2018

TSO activities to raise public awareness and trust

FSR Topic of the Month:  Raising public awareness and trust in electricity transmission infrastructure development Written by Pradyumna Bhagwat TSO activities to raise public awareness and […] read more

Page 1 of 1012345Next ›Last »
Tanase

Implementation Challenges: Private agreements

- Energy Union Law

FSR Topic of the Month:

Network Codes & Guidelines. A legal perspective.

by Lavinia-Petronela Tanase (FSR)

 

Week 3: Implementation challenges. Private agreements

Last week, the blog post tackled the topic of the electricity Network Codes and Guidelines being implemented via further Terms, Conditions and Methodologies (TCMs). In addition to these TCMs, though, what is very interesting is the fact that the Guidelines contain a mandatory electricity market regulatory framework which obliges transmission system operators, NEMOs and other market players to enter into private agreements.

For example, the CACM GL lays down a `robust, reliable and non-discriminatory Union governance framework for the single day-ahead and intraday coupling`. [1] This implies that the Guideline in itself creates obligations for the TSOs and NEMOs to enter into agreements for: NEMO-TSO cooperation, information exchange and non-disclosure of confidential information or on the intraday operation of the market coupling.

It is only through seamless cooperation, that the EU-wide market coupling goal can be achieved, in the day-ahead and intraday time frames. [2]

In addition, while performing the Market Coupling Operator function, the NEMOs shall be bound by a contractual framework which contains, among other contracts: operational agreements for the day-ahead and intraday market coupling processes, and cooperation agreements between NEMOs. Importantly, the CACM GL, in Article 7(3) also makes reference to the contracts that the NEMOs shall conclude with third parties. These contracts can be service agreements concluded with the day-ahead or intraday service providers.

The novelty in the implementation of the Guidelines comes from the fact that, under Article 7(5) of the CACM GL, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has been granted prerogatives to (i) monitor the NEMOs` progress in establishing and performing the market coupling operator function and (ii) analyse if the contractual and regulatory framework is effective and efficient. For this purpose, the NEMOs must send the draft agreements to be concluded among themselves and with third parties to ACER. ACER thus has continuous monitoring powers over this contractual framework of the NEMOs and between the NEMOs and third parties.

ACER shall report to the European Commission if these obligations have been fulfilled or not. In the latter case, ACER will inform the EC and may recommend any further measures. Curiously, the EC has direct intervention powers, in case the NEMOs do not fulfil their obligation to submit the draft agreements and, according to Article 7(6) CACM GL, the EC can even request an amendment of the Guideline itself.

In the case in which the real agreements concluded between the NEMOs or between them and third parties depart from the text of the draft agreements, ACER will again notify the EC and recommend further measures.

Given the fact that market coupling is one of the founding blocks of the Internal Energy Market, the NEMOs` agreements with other NEMOs and/or with third parties concluded for this purpose, are subject to the careful monitoring of national regulators, ACER and ultimately, the EC. The extensive powers of ACER and the potential direct intervention of the EC in the private understanding of two parties show that the electricity market is regulated to its core and that the decision-making process is steered from a higher-up level, in almost all situations.

 

 

[1] Recital 26, Commission Regulation 2015/1222 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management.

[2] Market coupling is a process which involves matching bids and offers on the basis of capacity calculation results issued by the TSOs.